Creating imaginary character Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Creating imaginary character - Research Paper Example The – comparatively – little land that we had was beautiful, all green and rolling hills with the scent of flowers wafting through the breeze. I, being his daughter, was not as well prepared to run such a large household that I do now even though my mother had given me as many helpful tips as possible as she had trained me to be the perfect lady of the manor. But as they say, with time you experience and, eventually, learn everything, and, indeed, I did do just that. It would be unforgivable and unchristian of me to say this but happily, both – my husband’s mother as well as father – had passed away when the Earl had been only twenty eight years old, he married me two years when he had just turned thirty. The former had died of problems of the lung. She had already been of weak health but because of the rise of industries and with it the smoke and the waste being dumped in the Thames, the air of London was affected. Seeing as she did not love the co untry and preferred to stay in the city, her lungs got damaged beyond repair due to the ever increasing pollution and it was only time before she died (Ross, 2008, p. 37). On the other hand, my father-in-law had had a quite a serious problem of gout. He drank too much due to certain problems which the Earl never spoke of and that led to his early death. He was a good friend of the Prince Regent, son of the current ruler King George III, and together, it was rumored, they had quite expensive habits and ways of entertainment despite the upheavals happening around the world, particularly in France. Our own brave men were fighting against Napolean’s army but the Regent had no interest in politics and/or military of the country that he was to officially rule in the future (Chancellor, 2007, p. 8). He did, however, order some great architecture like the Pavilion to be built and funded the making of many works of art (Grenville, 1856, pp. 408 - 409). My life before my marriage was s imple though it did not seem to be so to me then. Living with two brothers – both of them who were older than me – confirmed my belief that I had the worst siblings in the country. Other than the silly pranks that they played on me such as sneaking in to my room and hiding frogs under my bed covers, they – my eldest brother in particular – were also given more attention to by both of my parents. This, I learned as I grew older and became more aware of the world and how it ran, was because he was going to inherit the estate after my father passed away, thus, there were more things that he was to be taught. My younger brother was considered the â€Å"spare† which I only recently realized meant that by the off chance that my older brother met an early demise – due to a broken neck by falling off a horse or dying of some disease which the physician would not be able to cure him off – he would be the one taking over, be the heir. The estat e was entailed so only the males could inherit it and no chance was to be taken that a second cousin would take over what did not rightfully belong to them. My brothers had tutors at home whom they did their best to try to make them resign by being as mischievous as they possibly could until they were sent to Eton for further schooling. Over there they were taught literature and languages of the ancient

Foundations of Tort Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Foundations of Tort - Essay Example There are also intentional torts where the person being accused harmed the other with the full knowledge of what harm they are causing, for instance defamation and finally there is strict liability tort which covers injuries people suffer from using products, for instance if a person is burnt with hot coffee from a company that did not provide this information, by writing, to the consumers (Butler 2000 162). Torts usually result in compensation of the accusers, rather than the accused facing a jail term or other punitive measures similar to those in criminal offences. Therefore torts are civil suits brought against other people. The plaintiff in a tort has to prove three things in order to be compensated. First, they have to prove that those standing accused have a moral and legal obligation to act in a particular way. Secondly, the plaintiff has to [prove that the accused did not fulfill their obligation. Finally, she or he has to prove that she or he suffered an actual loss because of the accused not fulfilling their duties. Only after these have been established does the plaintiff get punitive or compensatory damages. Torts usually arise from common law principles coupled with legal enactments. The tort rules on compensation in Australia, especially those arising from accidents have been seen as being outdated, therefore inefficient in the way in which they work. In addition, if the party being sued is a government or public entity, there are several possibilities that people could exploit loopholes to get huge and undeserving compensation for mistakes of their own doing. Parties such as local governments in cities and counties could be sued for negligence by their residents should the latter feel that they have suffered a loss, physical harm or otherwise because the local government did not play its part in some sector or service provision, hence the loss suffered. Australia does not have a general system of compensation for victims, except in some very spe cific cases, for instance in traffic accidents. Thus, there is no cap on the amount of money that should be paid out to victims, leading to huge losses in cases of other forms of ‘negligence’ by the authorities. However, due to the increase in law suits against authorities in Australia, there was a necessity to start reforming laws on lawsuits against authorities. This led to the Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation & Compensation Act 2001. However, the laws under this act are still taking a while to be implemented (Muirhead & Hocking 2001, p. 111). The primary focus of the Australian tort law reform focuses more on insurance premiums as opposed to the how deep taxpayers have to dig in their pockets to pay for the numerous lawsuits filed against the authorities. It is becoming a source of concern for many citizens as to the source of money used to compensate victims who think they have been wronged by the negligence of the authorities. A higher dependency on insurance prem iums rather than public coffers has seen insurance premiums skyrocket to unbelievable rates. This dependence has been brought about by the authorities using money in the public coffers as a last resort measure to compensate victims of the authorities’ negligence, leaving a bulk of the money going to compensate on the shoulders of insurers. Application of such overreliance on insurers in other sectors where the government was the underwriter, for instance in the provision of medical and health care, has led to the insolvency of some big insurance companies and the withdrawal of others, because of the unprofitability of such undertakings. The result is that, at the end of the day, it is the taxpayers of a country who end up