Compare between Plato and Karl marx on the topic of human nature Essay

match between Plato and Karl marx on the topic of hu firearm reputation - Essay ExampleSimilarly, it will be some more difficult with respect to Karl Marx, not due to the fact that Marx had no opinion on the anesthetize (quite the opposite in fact), but rather due to the fact that Marx himself never specific every last(predicate)y sought to ensnarl on the topic. Rather, Marx would periodically discuss tangential manifestations of human nature with respect to essence and biological definitions of man within his works. To this end, I will seek to synthesize these tangential manifestations as a way of judgment what this author believes to be Karl Marxs get down to the issue of human nature within his belles-lettres. Firstly, when i considers Plato, they inevitably consider his inspiration and teacher Socrates. Socrates himself was highly interested in the notion of human nature as he so often came at odds with prevailing notions of his time while attempting to break by such s taunchly, albeit blindly, held beliefs that the men of his time clung to with such fervor. Accordingly, due to the fact that Socrates had such a profound jar on Plato, it is not beyond logic to assume that many of Platos own vox populis of human nature were themselves borrowed or at the very least inspired from Socrates. One such locating of humanity is of note distinctly related through Platos allegory of the countermine (Plato 44). Although a host of Platos writings deal with the topic of human nature, for purposes of this brief analysis, the author will only consider the allegory of the cave due to the length limitations that a more full and complete analysis might entail. It seems to me that such an approach is useful due to the fact that Plato can provide a well reasoned and differentiated view of reality and its relation to the constructs of human nature. Within this work, Plato introduces the reader to a situation in which allegorical prisoners ar chained to a cave wall for their entire lives never seeing anyone or the light of day. Rather, all the prisoners are able to discern is the flicker and the shadows of figures that the moving individuals and torches behind them portend. The allegory goes on to explain that if one of these creatures was taken erupt into the light of day to see the sun, to view the skies, and to feel the warmth of the air, they would likely feast frantically back into the bowels of the cave to escape from such perceptions that they might deem as unsavory and wildly foreign. In this way, Plato exhibits an example to the reader in which the reality/nature of the individual is uniquely born out of the perceptions/environment in which they have great(p) accustomed (Fromm 24). As such, Plato illustrates that encouraging such an individual to operation outside of their comfort zone or to think outside of the means by which they have grown accustomed very rarely yields a positive result. In this way, Plato exhibits a very tr alatitious view of human nature as something that is ingrained from the early experiences and years of an individuals life and seeks to confine and corral the ambitions, thoughts, dreams, and goals, of the individual for the remainder of the life. As this can be understood as a traditional approach to human nature, it must also be understood as